WebSection 23: Comparison by reference to circumstances Effect. 91. This section provides that like must be compared with like in cases of direct, dual or indirect discrimination. The treatment of the claimant must be compared with that of an actual or a hypothetical person – the comparator – who does not share the same protected characteristic as the … Webu Examples of comparators u Hypothetical comparators u Burden of proof u Examples u Occupational requirements u How to prove a disability discrimination claim. Introduction When completing your ET1, you will be asked to identify which claims you are making. This is at Section 8.1 of the ET1.
(3) Real or Hypothetical Comparator? 79 Although predecessors …
WebThe comparator issue thus lies at the heart of the question of the nature of the Community anti-discrimination model. The different philosophical trends and the different national judicial WebMay 6, 2024 · Broadly, to bring a successful equal pay claim, the claimant must show that a real (and not hypothetical) comparator of the opposite sex exists. That comparator must … can screen time cause depression
Comparators in direct discrimination cases - Citizens Advice
WebMay 15, 2024 · When trying to decide if someone has been treated less favourably because of a protected characteristic, tribunals can make a comparison with someone … WebMar 21, 2024 · The EAT clarified that it is not always necessary to identify a hypothetical comparator at all. However, if a hypothetical comparator is an appropriate approach to … Web(1)Where this Act imposes a duty to make reasonable adjustments on a person, this section, sections 21 and 22 and the applicable Schedule apply; and for those purposes, a person on whom the duty is imposed is referred to as A. (3)The first requirement is a requirement, where a provision, criterion or practice of A's puts a disabled person at a … flannel oufits from the 9s